Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Applica Consumer Products Inc v Petco animal Supplies Stores Inc et al, No. 2:09-cv-00222 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 23, 2009)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00222
Decided
October 23, 2009
Judge
Document
Order (scanned)
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - Accordingly, the court denies the plaintiffs application for a temporary restraining order and treats it as a request for preliminary injunction. The court also directs the parties to comply with the meet and confer and b…
Length
1 page

Case 2:09-cv-00222-JRG-RSP Document32 Filed 10/23/09 Page 1of1PagelD #:

<pagelD>

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

APPLICA CONSUMER §

PRODUCTS, INC, § §

VS. § CASE NO. 2:09-CV-222-TJW-CE § PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLY §

STORES, INC. AND PETCO §

SOUTHWEST, INC. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

The above-titled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 US.C. § 636 The report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his recommendation for the disposition of Applica’s application for a temporary restraining order (Dkt. No. 5), have been presented for consideration. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation. The court is of the opinion that the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the court hereby adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the conclusions of this court. Accordingly, the court denies the plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order and treats it as a request for preliminary injunction. The court also directs the parties to comply with the meet and confer and briefing directives set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation.

SIGNED this 22ndday of October, 2009.

TOM. Wed T, JOHN WARD "

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Applica Consumer Products Inc v Petco animal Supplies Stores Inc et al, No. 2:09-cv-00222 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 23, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00222-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00222-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.