Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

IP Co., LLC v. Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC et al, No. 2:09-cv-00037 (E.D. Tex. July 13, 2009)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00037, Dkt. No. 94
Decided
July 13, 2009
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ;Due to the large number of patent cases pending on the Courts docket, resulting involuminous motion practice, the Court finds it necessary to implement procedures applying to futuremotions to be submitted in recently filed cases. Thi…
Length
3 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

IP CO., LLC, d/b/a INTUS IQ, § §

Plaintiff, §

v. §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-CV-37

ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO., §

LLC, et al., § §

Defendant.

O R D E R

Due to the large number of patent cases pending on the Court’s docket, resulting in voluminous motion practice, the Court finds it necessary to implement procedures applying to future motions to be submitted in recently filed cases. This procedure is necessary to allow the Court to manage its docket in a timely fashion.

The procedure is as follows: Summary Judgment Motions: Prior to filing any summary judgment motion, the parties must submit letter briefs seeking permission to file the motion. The opening letter brief in each of those matters shall be no longer than five (5) pages and shall be filed with the Court no later than sixty (60) days before the deadline for filing summary judgment motions. Answering letter briefs in each of those matters shall be no longer than five (5) pages and filed with the Court no later than fourteen (14) days thereafter. Reply briefs in each of those matters shall be no longer than three (3) pages and filed with the Court no later than five (5) days thereafter. The Court may hold a hearing or telephone conference, if necessary, to hear arguments and to determine whether the filing of any motion will be permitted.

2Motions to Strike Expert Testimony/Daubert Motions: Prior to filing any Motions to Strike or Daubert Motions, the parties must submit letter briefs seeking permission to file the motion. The opening letter brief in each of those matters shall be no longer than three (3) pages and shall be filed with the Court no later than sixty (60) days before the deadline for filing Motions to Strike or Daubert Motions. Answering letter briefs in each of those matters shall be no longer than three (3) pages and filed with the Court no later than fourteen (14) days thereafter. Reply briefs in each of those matters shall be no longer than two (2) pages and filed with the Court no later than five (5) days thereafter. The Court may hold a hearing or telephone conference, if necessary, to hear arguments and to determine whether the filing of any motion will be permitted.

Motions in Limine: Prior to filing any Motions in Limine, the parties must submit letter briefs seeking permission to file the motion. The opening letter brief in each of those matters shall be no longer than three (3) pages and shall be filed with the Court no later than sixty (60) days before the deadline for filing Motions in Limine. Answering letter briefs in each of those matters shall be no longer than three (3) pages and filed with the Court no later than fourteen (14) days thereafter. Reply briefs in each of those matters shall be no longer than two (2) pages and filed with the Court no later than five (5) days thereafter. The Court may hold a hearing or telephone conference, if necessary, to hear arguments and to determine whether the filing of any motion will be permitted.

Claim Construction presentation: The parties shall prepare and present arguments at any future-scheduled claim-construction hearings on a claim term-by-claim term basis. The Court has found that presentation in this manner facilitates discussion as to the core disputes and promotes judicial efficiency, while presentation on a party-by-party basis is more difficult to follow and less efficient. Where it makes sense, the parties may group logically-related terms together. Any desired3 deviation from these claim-construction presentation guidelines shall be submitted to the Court by motion.

For all of the above mentioned motions, the letter briefs shall be filed without exhibits. Any requests to submit letter briefs after the deadlines outlined above must show good cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

IP Co., LLC v. Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC et al, No. 2:09-cv-00037 (E.D. Tex. July 13, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00037-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00037-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.