Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

TQP Development, LLC v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00471 (E.D. Tex. July 19, 2012)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00471, Dkt. No. 565
Decided
July 19, 2012
Judge
William C. Bryson, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Court GRANTS Defendants motion AS MODIFIED: Plaintiff shall file a response by 4:00 pm Central Daylight Time, . The Court will hear argument on Defendants motion immediately following the Pretrial Conference
Length
1 page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

TQP DEVELOPMENT, LLC, §

§ Plaintiff, § §

v. §

§ Case No. 2:08-CV-471-WCB MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., et al., § § Defendants. § § §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Expedited Briefing on its Motion for Sanctions and Jury Instructions Corresponding to the Court’s Rulings on Motions for Dismissal and Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 564). The Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion AS MODIFIED: Plaintiff shall file a response by 4:00 pm Central Daylight Time, Tuesday, July 24, 2012.

The Court will hear argument on Defendants’ motion immediately following the Pretrial Conference.

It is so ORDERED. SIGNED this 19th day of July, 2012.

WILLIAM C. BRYSON

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

TQP Development, LLC v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00471 (E.D. Tex. July 19, 2012).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00471-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00471-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.