Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Volkswagen of america, Incorporated v. MHL TEK, LLC et al, No. 2:08-cv-00405 (E.D. Tex. June 30, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00405, Dkt. No. 32
Decided
June 30, 2008
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL as to Counts I, II, and III of 10 Amended Complaint filed by Volkswagen of America, Incorporated
Length
2 pages

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

VOLKSWAGON OF AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff, Case No. 07-14992

v.

Hon. John Corbett O’Meara

MHL TEK, LLC., ANIMATRONICS, INC.,

MCLAUGHLIN ELECTRONICS, INC.,

MICHAEL HANDFIELD, AND

HELEN LALIBERTE

Defendants.

__________________________/

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

On January 25, 2008, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint alleging the following causes of action: Count I, Unfair Competition under Michigan Common Law; Count II, Defamation and Trade Dispargement under Michigan Common Law; Count III, Abuse of Process under Michigan Common Law; Count IV, Violation of the Lanham Act, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); Count V, Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement; Count VI, Declaratory Judgment of Patent Invalidity; and Count VII, Declaratory Judgment of Patent Unenforceability . Plaintiffs do not allege that diversity jurisdiction exists. Although Counts IV through VII are cognizable in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the remaining allegations present claims based on state law. This court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ state law claims so as to avoid jury confusion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966); Padilla v. City of Saginaw, 867 F. Supp. 1309 (E.D. Mich. 1994).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counts I, II, and III of Plaintiff’s amended2 complaint are DISMISSED.

s/John Corbett O’Meara United States District Judge

Date: June 30, 2008

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on this date, June 30, 2008, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz Case Manager

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Volkswagen of america, Incorporated v. MHL TEK, LLC et al, No. 2:08-cv-00405 (E.D. Tex. June 30, 2008).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00405-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00405-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.