Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Key Energy Services, Inc. v. C.C. Forbes, LLC et al, No. 2:08-cv-00346 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2010)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00346, Dkt. No. 121
Decided
September 28, 2010
Judge
David Folsom, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER; adopting 115 Report and Recommendations, 67 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Petron Industries Inc., denying 67 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Petron Industries Inc
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC. § § vs. §

§ CASE NO. 2:08-CV-346-DF-CE

C.C. FORBES, LLC AND PETRON § INDUSTRIES INC. §

ORDER

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 115), which recommends denying defendant Petron’s motion for summary judgement without prejudice to refiling after fact discovery is concluded, has been presented for consideration. The plaintiff did not file an objection to the report and recommendation.

The court is of the opinion that the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the court adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, in its entirety, as the conclusions of this court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that defendant Petron’s motion for summary judgement is DENIED without prejudice to refiling.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Key Energy Services, Inc. v. C.C. Forbes, LLC et al, No. 2:08-cv-00346 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2010).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00346-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00346-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case