Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Stragent, LLC v. Nokia Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00293 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2009)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00293, Dkt. No. 181
Decided
September 9, 2009
Judge
David Folsom, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 179 Motion to Dismiss Google from case
Length
1 page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

STRAGENT LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) vs. ) Case No. 2:08-CV-293 ) NOKIA, INC., ET AL. )

) )

Defendants. )

)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court grants the joint motion to dismiss filed by Stragent LLC (“Stragent”) and Google Inc. (“Google”). All claims brought by Stragent LLC are dismissed with prejudice, and all claims, counterclaims and defenses made by Google Inc. are dismissed without prejudice. Google shall retain its ability to assert all defenses and/or claims in the event of any further litigation. Stragent has not released, and nothing in this dismissal shall be construed as a license, release or discharge of, any claim Stragent has or may have in the future against any other defendant named in this action. All such rights have been, and are, expressly reserved. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorney fees.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Stragent, LLC v. Nokia Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00293 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00293-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00293-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.