Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Aloft Media LLC v. Nokia Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00099 (E.D. Tex. July 13, 2009)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00099, Dkt. No. 158
Decided
July 13, 2009
Judge
David Folsom, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 156 Motion to Dismiss Nokia Inc and Nokia Corp
Length
1 page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ALOFT MEDIA LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 2:08-CV-099 )

NOKIA, INC., ET AL. )

) )

Defendants. )

)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The Court grants the joint motion to dismiss filed by Aloft Media, LLC (“Aloft Media”), Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corp. (collectively “Nokia”). All claims between Aloft Media and Nokia in the instant action are hereby dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the Agreement reached by the parties. Nokia shall retain its ability to assert all defenses and/or claims in the event of any further litigation. Aloft has not released, and nothing in this dismissal shall be construed as a license, release or discharge of, any claim Aloft has or may have in the future against any other defendant named in this action or any other asserted infringer of the patent-in-suit. All such rights have been, and are, expressly reserved. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorney fees.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Aloft Media LLC v. Nokia Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00099 (E.D. Tex. July 13, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00099-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00099-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.