Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Personalized Media Communications, L.L.C. v. Motorola, Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 12, 2014)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00070, Dkt. No. 428
Decided
August 12, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 419 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

PERSONALIZED MEDIA §

COMMUNICATIONS, L.L.C. §

§

Case No. 2:08-CV-70-RSP

v. § § ECHOSTAR CORP., et al. §

ORDER

Before the Court are PMC’s Motion for Summary Judgment on its Claim for Declaratory Judgment and on Certain Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 396), and the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 419) recommending that the motion be granted. Having considered the objections filed by Defendants Echostar Corp. and Dish Network Corp. (Dkt. Nos. 421 and 425) and by Defendants Rovi Guides, Inc. and TVG, Inc. (Dkt. Nos. 420 and 426), and having conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation as to which objection was made, and finding no error therein, the Court does hereby adopt the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment on its Claim for Declaratory Judgment and on Certain Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 396) is GRANTED, the declaratory judgment requested in Count VI of PMC’s Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 374) is GRANTED, Counterclaim Counts Four and Five of the Echostar Defendants’ Answer to PMC’s Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 382) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and all remaining claims by or against Rovi/TVG (Dkt. 384) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Personalized Media Communications, L.L.C. v. Motorola, Inc. et al, No. 2:08-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 12, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00070-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00070-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.