Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc vs Wyeth et al, No. 2:08-cv-00067 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2010)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:08-cv-00067, Dkt. No. 143
Decided
April 12, 2010
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - the court is of the opinion that the conclusion of the Magistrate are correct. The court adopts, in its entirety, the report. The court DENIES the dft's motion to dismiss
Length
1 page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

NOVARTIS VACCINES & DIAGNOSTICS, §

INC. § § vs. § CASE NO. 2:08-CV-67-TJW-CE § WYETH AND WYETH §

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. §

ORDER

The above-titled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 135), which contains his recommendation that the court deny the defendants Wyeth’s and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 113), has been presented for consideration. No objections were filed to the report and recommendation. The court is of the opinion that the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the court adopts, in its entirety, the report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the conclusions of this court. Accordingly, the court DENIES the defendants’ motion to dismiss.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc vs Wyeth et al, No. 2:08-cv-00067 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2010).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00067-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_08-cv-00067-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.