Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Mondis Technology Ltd v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00565 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00565, Dkt. No. 115
Decided
March 31, 2009
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
***DEPLICATE ORDER PLEASE IGNORE SEE ORDER #114***MEMORANDUM ORDER denies plaintiff's motion #62
Length
1 page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

MONDIS TECHNOLOGY LTD. §

§ vs. § CASE NO. 2:07-CV-565 § LG ELECTRONICS INC., ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

The above-titled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his recommendation for the disposition of plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. No. 62) has been presented for consideration. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation. The court is of the opinion that the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the court hereby adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the conclusions of this court. Accordingly, the court denies the plaintiff’s motion.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Mondis Technology Ltd v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00565 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_07-cv-00565-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_07-cv-00565-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.