Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00341 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2008)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00341, Dkt. No. 107
Decided
September 25, 2008
Judge
David Folsom, J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 101 Report and Recommendations,, 35 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Symbol Technologies, Inc. Accordingly, the court deniesSymbols motion to dismiss
Length
1 page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COMMIL USA, LLC § § vs. § CASE NO. 2:07-CV-341-TJW-CE § CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. § §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

The above-titled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendation for the disposition of Symbol’s motion (#35) to dismiss, has been presented for consideration. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation. The court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the court hereby adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. Accordingly, the court denies Symbol’s motion to dismiss.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00341 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2008).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_07-cv-00341-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_07-cv-00341-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.