Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Freedom Wireless, Inc. v. alltel Corporation et al, No. 2:06-cv-00504 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 24, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00504, Dkt. No. 284
Decided
September 24, 2008
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying deft's #170 motion to sever and stay
Length
1 page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

FREEDOM WIRELESS, INC., § § vs. § CASE NO. 2:06-CV-504-TJW-CE § ALLTEL CORP. ET AL. § §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

The above-titled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of the defendants’ Motion (#170) to Sever and Stay, or in the Alternative, to Transfer, has been presented for consideration. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation. The court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the court hereby adopts the report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. Accordingly, the court denies the defendants’ motion to sever and stay, or in the alternative, to transfer.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Freedom Wireless, Inc. v. alltel Corporation et al, No. 2:06-cv-00504 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 24, 2008).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_06-cv-00504-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_06-cv-00504-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.