Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Mass Engineered Design, Inc. et al v. Ergotron, Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00272 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2008)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00272, Dkt. No. 272
Decided
March 20, 2008
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - the Court issues thissupplemental opinion to further identify the exhibits that it ordered MASS to produce. Docket No. 234's Exhibits Non-ex parte Exhibits - Exhibit A - Exhibit 4 to Docket No. 16…
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

MASS ENGINEERED DESIGN, INC. and § JERRY MOSCOVITCH § §

Plaintiffs §

§ CASE NO. 206 CV 272

vs. § PATENT CASE § ERGOTRON, INC., DELL INC., CDW §

CORPORATION, and TECH DATA § CORPORATION § §

Defendants §

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The Court previously ruled on Ergotron’s Motion to Compel Discovery and for an Order Concerning Plaintiff’s Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege (Docket No. 162). See Memorandum Opinion and Order, Docket No. 270. In that opinion, the Court ordered MASS to produce four documents. The Court referenced MASS’s exhibits to Docket No. 234, which was filed ex parte. As Defendants are unable to view the exhibit list to Docket No. 234, the Court issues this supplemental opinion to further identify the exhibits that it ordered MASS to produce.

Docket No. 234's ExhibitsNon-ex parte Exhibits
Exhibit AExhibit 4 to Docket No. 162
Exhibit BExhibit 6 to Docket No. 162
Exhibit CExhibit 3 to Docket No. 239
Exhibit DExhibit 4 to Docket No. 239

2So ORDERED and SIGNED this 20th day of March, 2008.

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

LEONARD DAVIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Mass Engineered Design, Inc. et al v. Ergotron, Inc. et al, No. 2:06-cv-00272 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2008).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_06-cv-00272-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_06-cv-00272-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case