Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

USA Video Technology Corporation v. Time Warner, Inc., et al, No. 2:06-cv-00239 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2006)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:06-cv-00239, Dkt. No. 40
Decided
August 29, 2006
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
REFERRAL ORDER - that discovery disputes and discovery motions filed in this case shall be REFERRED, to United States Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

USA VIDEO TECHNOLOGY §

CORPORATION § §

VS. § Case No. 2:06-CV-239 § TIME WARNER, INC., ET AL. §

REFERRAL ORDER

In an effort to prevent undue delays in this complicated case, the undersigned hereby enters the following Referral Order.

It is ORDERED that discovery disputes and discovery motions, as well as certain other motions filed in this case, shall be REFERRED, at the discretion of, or in the absence of, the undersigned, to United States Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines. The United States Magistrate Judge shall hear and determine such matters as are within the magistrate judge’s dispositive jurisdiction and proceed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) concerning such matters that are excepted from the magistrate judge’s dispositive jurisdiction.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

USA Video Technology Corporation v. Time Warner, Inc., et al, No. 2:06-cv-00239 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2006).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_06-cv-00239-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_06-cv-00239-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.