ORDER that the Cour is of the opinion that the finding and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. The Court overrules dfts objections and adopts the memorandum opinion and order of the U S Magistrate Judge as the Opinion and Order…
The above entitled and numbered civil action has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Memorandum Opinion and Order (Docket Nos. 140) containing the Magistrate Judge’s claim construction ruling has been presented for consideration. Defendants have filed objections (Docket Nos. 151) to the Memorandum Opinion and Order; however the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby overrules Defendants objections and adopts the Memorandum Opinion and Order of the United States Magistrate Judge as the Opinion and Order of this Court.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of February, 2007.
LEONARD DAVIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Vision advancement LLC v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc, No. 2:05-cv-00455 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2007).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.
