Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Fenner Investments, Ltd., v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al, No. 2:05-cv-00005 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 15, 2006)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00005, Dkt. No. 272
Decided
February 15, 2006
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 232 Accordingly all Fenner's claims that Ericsson Inc., Ericsson AB, and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericssons PDSN and Home Agent Products infringe US Patent No 6,819,670 are hereby Dismissed without…
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

FENNER INVESTMENTS, LTD., §

Plaintiff §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:05cv5

vs. § § JUNIPER NETWORKS INC., §

UTSTARCOM, INC., NOKIA, INC., §

NORTEL NETWORKS, INC, LUCENT §

TECHNOLOGY, INC., CICSO §

SYSTEMS, INC., ERICSSON, INC., §

ERICSSON AB, §

TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET, LM, §

ERICSSON AND ALCATEL USA, INC. §

Defendants. §

ORDER

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. The parties have made no objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 232) as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly, all of Fenner’s claims that Ericsson Inc., Ericsson AB, and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson’s PDSN and Home Agent Products infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,819,670 are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the parties’ Settlement Agreement and Release.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Fenner Investments, Ltd., v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al, No. 2:05-cv-00005 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 15, 2006).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_05-cv-00005-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_05-cv-00005-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.