iS DISTRICT COUR: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICI COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS = 5007-5 PH 3:09
MARSHALL DIVISION
IAP INTERMODAL, LIC, §
BY...
S
Plaintiff, § § Vv § Consolidated Civil Action
§ No A ed Gs § 1 LAF UC
NORTHWEST AIRLINES CORP 8 a CANTY BI AL; § §
Defendants. §
CONSENT JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS AMR CORPORATION,
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., AMR EAGLE HOLDING CORP.,
AND AMERICAN EAGLE ATRLINES, INC,

1 The Plaintiff, IAP Intermodal, LLC, (“IAP”), filed the present action against AMR Corporation, American Aizlines, Inc , AMR Eagle Holding Corp , and American Eagie Airlines, Inc , alleging infringement of US Patent Nos. 6,240,362, 6,385,537, and 6,411,897 (“Patents at Issue”) The Defendants have appeared in this action and deny infringement of any of the Patents at Issue 2 On September: 7, 2005, the Court issued its Memorandum Opinion and Order construing the
TU terms of the Patents atIissue (Dkt # 078 in the consolidated cases) Based upon the construction of the claims and the definition of terms contained in the Court’s Memorandum Opimion and Order, the Plaintiff IAP stipulates that the Defendants in this action are not infringing any of the claims of the Patents at Issne The Plaintiff IAP therefore consents to the entry of final judgment of nen-inflingement 3 Nothing herem shall limit or prevent [AP from exercising any Jegitimate right it may have to appeal thts Fidgment The Defendants in this action agree that they will not contest any appeal of
Vast: 299235]

2this Judgment on the ground that it was entered into by stipulation, or contend that this stipulation precludes an appeal of this matter in any way 4 Based on the foregoing, the Court hereby enters Final Judgment as follows:
(a) Judgment is entereidn favor of the Defendants AMR Corporation, American Airlines, Inc., AMR Eagle Holding Corp, and American Eagle Airlines, Inc, on any and all claims of infringement set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint in this Action;
(b) All counterclaims and defenses asserted by the Defendants in this Action are hereby
dismissed without prejudice; and
(c)} Fach party shall bear its own costs and fees
byw Cobber s RO0S, Z STATES Heawed
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONIENT:
C08 —e
Carl R. Roth State Bat No 17312000 THE ROTH LAW FIRM
115 .N Wellington, Suite 200 Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: 903/935-1665 Facsimile: 903/935-1797 D Scott Hemingway TX Bar No 094078380 Malcolm Pipes TX Bar No 24026061 Hemingway LLP S117 Preston Road. Suite 460

3Dallas, Texas 75225 (214)292 8301 Doyle W. Curry TX Bar No 5268000 Curry & Morin, LLP 20] West Houston St Marshall, Texas 75671 Telephone: (903)927:2277 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFE IAP INTERMODAL, LLC
Ofis Carroll State Bar No 03895700 Collin Maloney State Bar No 00794219 lreland, Carroll & Kelley, PC 6101 S. Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, [X 75703 Telephone: (903) 561-1600
Facsimile: (903) 581- 107d
ii brarnsig | pin errand
Oyun Wanel [o
JohnF .W ard Ward & Olivo 708 Third Avenne New York, New York 10017 Telephone: (212) 697-6262 Facsimile: (212) 972-5866 Edward Bakos Ward & Olivo 382 Springfield Avenue Summit, New Jersey 07901 Telephone: (908) 277.3333 Facsimile: (908) 277-6373 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
AMR CORPORATION, AMERICAN AIRLINES
INC, AMR EAGLE HOLDING CORP , AND
AMERICAN BAGLE AIRLINES, INC
243