Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Orange Electronic Co. Ltd. v. autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd., No. 24-1876 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 23, 2026)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1876
Also Docketed
No. 24-1885 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
January 23, 2026
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

January 27, 2026

ERRATA

Appeal Nos. 2024-1876, 2024-1885 ORANGE ELECTRONIC CO. LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AUTEL INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CORP.,

LTD.,

Defendant-Cross-Appellant Decided: January 23, 2026

Nonprecedential Opinion

Please make the following change: The opinion is changed to replace the word “grant” with “denial” on page 11, line 22.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Orange Electronic Co. Ltd. v. autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd., No. 24-1876 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 23, 2026).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-24-01876-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-24-01876-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.