Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Jacki Easlick, LLC v. CJ Emerald, No. 24-1826 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 14, 2026)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1826
Decided
August 14, 2026
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

August 17, 2026

ERRATUM

Appeal No. 24-1538, 2024-1826 JACKI EASLICK, LLC, JE CORPORATE LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

ACCENCYC US

Defendant-Appellee

CJ EMERALD, ET AL.

Defendants

Decided: August 14, 2026 Nonprecedential Opinion

Please make the following change:

On page 3, footnote 1, change “permissible” to “impermissible”

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Jacki Easlick, LLC v. CJ Emerald, No. 24-1826 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 14, 2026).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-24-01826-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-24-01826-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.