Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

GoTV Streaming, LLC v. Netflix, Inc., No. 24-1669 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2026)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1669
Also Docketed
No. 24-1744 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
February 9, 2026
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

April 7, 2026

ERRATA

Appeal Nos. 2024-1669, 2024-1744 GOTV STREAMING, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

NETFLIX, INC.,

Defendant-Cross-Appellant Decided: February 9, 2026

Precedential Opinion

Please make the following changes:

On page 2, line 5, after “related” insert “patents,” On page 2, line 6, after “8,103,865” insert a comma

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

GoTV Streaming, LLC v. Netflix, Inc., No. 24-1669 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2026).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-24-01669-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-24-01669-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.