Fed. Cir.

Duke University v. Sandoz Inc., No. 24-1078 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 18, 2025)

Errata

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 24-1078
Decided: November 18, 2025
Judge: —
Document: Errata
Length: 1 page

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

February 23, 2026

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2024-1078

DUKE UNIVERSITY, ALLERGAN SALES, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

SANDOZ INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

Decided: November 18, 2025

Precedential Opinion

Please make the following changes: On page 8 lines 11-12, change “4,230, which was Allergan’s expert’s view, or 1,620, as Sandoz’s expert opined” to “4,230, which was Sandoz’s expert’s view, or 1,620, as Allergan’s expert opined” On page 16 footnote 4, change both instances of “—C=C—” to “—C≡C—”

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Duke University v. Sandoz Inc., No. 24-1078 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 18, 2025).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-24-01078-1
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-24-01078-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error