Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Coda Development s.r.o. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, No. 23-1880 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2025)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1880
Decided
December 8, 2025
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

December 11, 2025

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2023-1880

CODA DEVELOPMENT S.R.O., CODA

INNOVATIONS S.R.O., FRANTISEK HRABAL,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, ROBERT

BENEDICT,

Defendants-Appellees

Decided: December 8, 2025

Precedential Opinion

Please make the following change: On page 13, line 28, replace “Goodyear’s assertion that these two elements” with “Coda’s assertion that these two elements”.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Coda Development s.r.o. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, No. 23-1880 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-23-01880-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-23-01880-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.