Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Golden v. apple Inc., No. 22-1229 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 8, 2022)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Errata
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1229
Also Docketed
No. 22-1267 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 8, 2022
Judge
—
Document
Errata
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

September 13, 2022

ERRATA

LARRY GOLDEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

APPLE INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA, LG

ELECTRONICS USA, INC., QUALCOMM

INCORPORATED, MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.,

PANASONIC CORPORATION, AT&T INC.,

VERIZON CORPORATION SERVICE GROUP,

SPRINT CORPORATION, T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, FAIRWAY

FORD LINCOLN OF GREENVILLE, GENERAL

MOTORS COMPANY, KEVIN WHITAKER

CHEVROLET, FCA US LLC, BIG O DODGE

CHRYSLER JEEP RAM,

Defendants

2022-1229

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in No. 6:20-cv-04353-JD, Judge Joseph Dawson, III.

2LARRY GOLDEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant

2022-1267

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in No. 6:21-cv-00244-JD, Judge Joseph Dawson, III.

Decided: September 8, 2022

Nonprecedential Opinion

Please make the following change: Page 5, line 25: Replace “9,069,189” with “9,096,189.”

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Golden v. apple Inc., No. 22-1229 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 8, 2022).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-22-01229-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-22-01229-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case