NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
February 22, 2022
ERRATA
Appeal Nos. 2020-2222, 2021-1527
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
BROADCOM LIMITED, NKA BROADCOM INC.,
BROADCOM CORPORATION, AVAGO
TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, NKA AVAGO
TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE.
LIMITED, APPLE INC.,
Defendants-Appellants
Decided: February 4, 2022
Precedential Opinion
Please make the following changes:
Page 23, lines 28-29 (majority opinion): “all claims and grounds not in the IPR but which reasonably could have been included” is changed to “all grounds not stated in the2 petition but which reasonably could have been asserted against the claims included.” Page 24, line 1 (majority opinion): “grounds asserted” is changed to “challenged claims.”
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
The California Institute v. Broadcom Limited, No. 20-2222 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 4, 2022).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.