Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

NetSoc, LLC v. Oath Inc., No. 20-1437 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 31, 2020)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1437
Decided
December 31, 2020
Judge
Stoll, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

NETSOC, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

OATH INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2020-1437

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:18-cv-12267-RA, Judge Ronnie Abrams.

Decided: December 31, 2020

WILLIAM PETERSON RAMEY, III, Ramey & Schwaller, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. RALPH JEFFREY CARTER, Duane Morris LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by KEVIN PAUL ANDERSON, Washington, DC.

Before TARANTO, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

22 NETSOC, LLC v. OATH INC.

NetSoc, LLC appeals the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York’s dismissal of certain patent-infringement allegations against Oath Inc. The district court held that NetSoc was collaterally estopped from asserting infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,218,591 following a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas holding claims in related U.S. Patent No. 9,978,107 patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. See NetSoc, LLC v. Match Grp., LLC, No. 3:18-CV-01809-N, 2019 WL 3304704, at *3 (N.D. Tex. July 22, 2019). Our determination in NetSoc, LLC v. Match Grp., No. 20-1195 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 31, 2020), issued herewith, holding the claims of the ’591 patent ineligible under § 101 renders the issues in this case moot. Therefore, we dismiss as moot NetSoc’s appeal of the district court’s decision.

DISMISSED

COSTS

No costs.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

NetSoc, LLC v. Oath Inc., No. 20-1437 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 31, 2020).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-20-01437-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-20-01437-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.