Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Lippert Components Mfg. v. MOR/ryde International Inc., No. 19-2121 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2020)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-2121
Decided
June 8, 2020
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

LIPPERT COMPONENTS MANUFACTURING, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RYAN MATTHEW FOUNTAIN,

Sanctioned Party-Appellant

v.

MOR/RYDE INTERNATIONAL INC., MOR/RYDE

INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2019-2121

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana in No. 3:14-cv-01999-JDMGG, Judge Jon DeGuilio.

Decided: June 8, 2020

JONATHAN FROEMEL, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by ELIZABETH A. PETERS.

22 LIPPERT COMPONENTS MFG. v. MOR/RYDE INTERNATIONAL

INC. RYAN MATTHEW FOUNTAIN, Mishawaka, IN, argued pro se. JOSEPH ALBERT SALTIEL, Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees.

Before PROST, Chief Judge, REYNA and TARANTO, Circuit

Judges.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana sanctioned Ryan M. Fountain under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and struck some of his filings from the record. See Lippert Components Mfg., Inc. v. Mor/Ryde Int’l Inc., No. 3:14-cv-1999, ECF No. 90 (N.D. Ind. May 20, 2016); id., ECF No. 145 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 23, 2017); id., ECF No. 161 (N.D. Ind. Aug. 10, 2017). Mr. Fountain appeals these actions.

Because we determine that the district court’s 28 U.S.C. § 1927 sanction award was not based upon clear errors of fact and was not an abuse of discretion, we affirm the award. We further determine that we lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s striking of the filings from the record, which does not constitute a sanction of Mr. Fountain. Accordingly, insofar as this appeal challenges the district court’s striking of filings from the record, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. AFFIRMED-IN-PART AND DISMISSED-IN-PART

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Lippert Components Mfg. v. MOR/ryde International Inc., No. 19-2121 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2020).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-19-02121-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-19-02121-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.