Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

VirnetX Inc. v. apple Inc., No. 19-1050 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 22, 2019)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1050
Decided
November 22, 2019
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

November 26, 2019

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2019-1050

VIRNETX INC., LEIDOS, INC., FKA SCIENCE

APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL

CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

APPLE INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -

VIRNETX INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

APPLE INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

Decided: November 22, 2019

Non-Precedential Opinion

Please make the following changes: On page 15, line 13, “How” is changed to “Deciding how” On page 31, line 6, “We remand” is changed to “We vacate the damages award and remand” On page 31, line 9, after “REVERSED IN PART,” “VACATED IN PART,” is added

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

VirnetX Inc. v. apple Inc., No. 19-1050 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 22, 2019).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-19-01050-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-19-01050-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.