Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Uniloc USA, Inc. v. E-Mds, Inc., No. 18-1893 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2019)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 18-1893
Decided
February 8, 2019
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

E-MDS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,

MERIDIANEMR, INC., HEALTHTRONICS, INC.,

ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC., ALTARIS

CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, MEDHOST,

INC., COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS,

INC., E-MDS, INC., A TEXAS

CORPORATION, HEALTHTRONICS

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.,

AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION,

AMERISOURCEBERGEN HOLDING

CORPORATION, INTUITIVE MEDICAL

SOFTWARE, LLC, ALTARIS HEALTH

PARTNERS II, L.P., ALTARIS HEALTH PARTNERS

III, L.P., AHP-HT II ACQUISITION

COMPANY, LLC, AHP-HT III ACQUISITION

COMPANY, LLC, INTERNATIONAL

ONCOLOGY NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.,

SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA,

INC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY

GROUP, INC., VISTA EQUITY

PARTNERS FUND IV, LIGHTNING ACQUISITION,

LLC, EPIC HOSTING, LLC, EPIC

SYSTEMS CORPORATION, CERNER HEALTH

SERVICES, INC., GENERAL

2ELECTRIC COMPANY, DBA GE HEALTHCARE,

ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS,

INC., CERNER CORPORATION, LIGHTNING

HOLDINGS, LLC, GREENWAY

HEALTH, INC., GREENWAY HEALTH, LLC,

GREENWAY MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendants

2018-1893

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:14-cv-00625-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder, III.

Decided: February 8, 2019

BRETT MANGRUM, Etheridge Law Group, Southlake, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by RYAN LOVELESS, JIM ETHERIDGE.

Before MOORE, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs-Appellants sued Defendants for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,628,526 and 5,715,451. Defendants moved to dismiss on ineligibility grounds, and the district court partially granted this motion. Plaintiffs-Appellants and Defendants subsequently settled their dispute and jointly stipulated to dismissal of the case. Plaintiffs-Appellants did not reserve the right to appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for mootness pursuant to Aqua Marine Supply v. AIM Machining, Inc., 247 F.3d 1216, 1218–20 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

3DISMISSED

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Uniloc USA, Inc. v. E-Mds, Inc., No. 18-1893 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2019).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-18-01893-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-18-01893-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.