Fed. Cir.

SportStar athletics, Inc. v. Wilson Sporting Goods Company, No. 18-1136 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 17, 2018)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 18-1136
Decided: September 17, 2018
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit SPORTSTAR ATHLETICS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

WILSON SPORTING GOODS COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee

2018-1136

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in No. 4:15-cv-01438, Judge Melinda Harmon.

JUDGMENT

JOHN J. EDMONDS, Collins Edmonds & Schlather, PLLC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. JEFFERY A. KEY, Key & Associates, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, WALLACH, and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 17, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

SportStar athletics, Inc. v. Wilson Sporting Goods Company, No. 18-1136 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 17, 2018).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-18-01136-0
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-18-01136-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error