Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Doczy v. Verifone Systems, Inc., No. 17-2571 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 23, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2571
Decided
August 23, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

DANIEL J. DOCZY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

VERIFONE SYSTEMS, INC., VERIFONE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2017-2571

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 0:16-cv-62370-WPD, Judge William P. Dimitrouleas.

JUDGMENT

KEVIN N. MALEK, Malek Moss, PLLC, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. RYAN J. MARTON, Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by HECTOR JULIAN RIBERA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and STOLL,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 23, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Doczy v. Verifone Systems, Inc., No. 17-2571 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 23, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-02571-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-02571-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error