Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

CenTrak, Inc. v. Sonitor Technologies, Inc., No. 17-2510 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 14, 2019)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2510
Decided
February 14, 2019
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

June 3, 2019

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2017-2510 CENTRAK, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SONITOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee Decided: February 14, 2019 Precedential Opinion

Please make the following change: Page 7, line 16 replace “Sonitor appeals” with “CenTrak appeals”.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

CenTrak, Inc. v. Sonitor Technologies, Inc., No. 17-2510 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 14, 2019).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-02510-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-02510-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.