Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Asghari-Kamrani v. United Services automobile, No. 17-2504 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 11, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2504
Also Docketed
No. 17-2505 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 11, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit KAMRAN ASGHARI-KAMRANI, NADER ASGHARI-

KAMRANI,

Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants

v.

UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellant

2017-2504, 2017-2505

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 2:15-cv-00478-RGDRJK, Senior Judge Robert G. Doumar.

JUDGMENT

ANTIGONE GABRIELLA PEYTON, Protorae Law PLLC, Tysons, VA, argued for plaintiffs-cross-appellants. Also represented by REECE WERNER NIENSTADT, Nienstadt PLLC, Washington, DC. AHMED JAMAL DAVIS, Fish & Richardson PC, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by MATTHEW C. BERNTSEN, GRANT THOMAS RICE, Boston, MA; MICHAEL T. ZOPPO, New York, NY.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 11, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Asghari-Kamrani v. United Services automobile, No. 17-2504 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 11, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-02504-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-02504-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error