Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Carucel Investments, L.P. v. Novatel Wireless, Inc., No. 17-2301 (Fed. Cir. July 13, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2301
Decided
July 13, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CARUCEL INVESTMENTS, L.P., A DELAWARE

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC., A DELAWARE

CORPORATION, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, CELLCO

PARTNERSHIP, DBA VERIZON WIRELESS, A

DELAWARE GENERAL PARTNERSHIP,

Defendants-Appellees

2017-2301

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:16-cv-00118-H-KSC, Judge Marilyn L. Huff.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT M. HARKINS, JR., RuyakCherian LLP, Berkeley, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by KORULA T. CHERIAN; ROBERT F. RUYAK, Washington, DC; JERROLD GANZFRIED, Ganzfried Law, Washington, DC.

2AMARDEEP LAL THAKUR, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by BRUCE R. ZISSER.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 13, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Carucel Investments, L.P. v. Novatel Wireless, Inc., No. 17-2301 (Fed. Cir. July 13, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-02301-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-02301-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.