Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Oleksy v. General Electric Company, No. 17-2225 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 9, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2225
Decided
April 9, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

HENRYK OLEKSY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee

ALIN MACHINING COMPANY, INC., DBA POWER

PLANT SERVICES CORPORATION,

Defendant 2017-2225

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:06-cv-01245, Judge Virginia M. Kendall.

JUDGMENT

SLAWOMIR ZBIGNIEW SZCZEPANSKI, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. MARLA BUTLER, Robins Kaplan LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by

2BRENDA L. JOLY; SANG YOUNG A. BRODIE, General Electric Company, Niskayuna, NY. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 9, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Oleksy v. General Electric Company, No. 17-2225 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 9, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-02225-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-02225-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error