Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands Corporation, No. 17-2194 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2194
Decided
January 16, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TINNUS ENTERPRISES, LLC, ZURU LTD.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

TELEBRANDS CORPORATION, BULBHEAD.COM,

LLC, BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants

2017-2194

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:17-cv-00170-RWS-JDL, Judge Robert Schroeder, III.

JUDGMENT

THOMAS MANSFIELD DUNLAP, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Leesburg, VA, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by DAVID LUDWIG, ERIC LORENZ OLAVSON, ROBERT D. SPENDLOVE; JEFFREY AHDOOT, Washington, DC; BRIAN M. KOIDE, Vienna, VA; CORTLAND CHRISTOPHER PUTBRESE, Richmond, VA. DAVID MICHAEL UNDERHILL, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants.

2Also represented by STACEY K. GRIGSBY, ERIC J. MAURER; ELANA ARAJ, ROBERT THOMAS MALDONADO, Cooper & Dunham, LLP, New York, NY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 16, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands Corporation, No. 17-2194 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-02194-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-02194-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error