Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

SP Plus Corporation v. IPT, LLC, No. 17-2151 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 19, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2151
Decided
December 19, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SP PLUS CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

IPT, LLC, DBA PAYLOCK,

Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT LLC,

Third Party Defendant-Appellee

2017-2151

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in No. 2:16-cv-02474-MLCFJCW, Judge Martin L.C. Feldman.

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER KENT RALSTON, Phelps Dunbar LLP, New Orleans, LA, argued for plaintiff-appellee and third party defendant-appellee. Plaintiff-appellee SP Plus Corporation also represented by LINDSAY CALHOUN, ARTHUR R. KRAATZ.

2SCOTT D. STIMPSON, Sills Cummis & Gross P.C., New York, NY, argued for defendant/third party plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by TOD M. MELGAR; MICHAEL J. PISKO, Newark, NJ.

ROBERT PATRICK VANCE, Jones Walker LLP, New Orleans, LA, for third party defendant-appellee. Also represented by TYLER J. RENCH. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

SP Plus Corporation v. IPT, LLC, No. 17-2151 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 19, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-02151-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-02151-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.