Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Uniloc USA, Inc. v. amazon.com, Inc., No. 17-2051 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2051
Decided
August 9, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON DIGITAL

SERVICES, INC., GOOGLE LLC, HOME BOX

OFFICE, INC., HULU, LLC, NETFLIX, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2017-2051

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:16-cv-00570-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder, III.

JUDGMENT

TIMOTHY EDWARD GROCHOCINSKI, Nelson Bumgardner Albritton P.C., Orland Park, IL, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by JOSEPH P. OLDAKER; EDWARD R. NELSON, III, Fort Worth, TX; JAMES ETHERIDGE, RYAN S. LOVELESS, Etheridge Law Group, Southlake, TX. DAN L. BAGATELL, Perkins Coie LLP, Hanover, NH,

2argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, Inc., Google LLC, Hulu, LLC, Netflix, Inc. also represented by ANDREW DUFRESNE, Madison, WI; BOBBIE J. WILSON, San Francisco, CA; DANIEL T. SHVODIAN, Palo Alto, CA; MATTHEW COOK BERNSTEIN, San Diego, CA. Defendant-appellee Google LLC also represented by JEANNINE YOO SANO, White & Case LLP, Palo Alto, CA. ALAN ERNST LITTMANN, Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum, LLP, Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellee Home Box Office, Inc. Also represented by DOUG J. WINNARD.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 9, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Uniloc USA, Inc. v. amazon.com, Inc., No. 17-2051 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-02051-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-02051-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.