Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

New World International, Inc. v. Ford Global Technologies, LLC, No. 17-1956 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 13, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1956
Decided
March 13, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit NEW WORLD INTERNATIONAL, INC., NATIONAL

AUTO PARTS, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, FORD

MOTOR COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees

2017-1956

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas in No. 3:16-cv-01112-M, Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT GLENN OAKE, JR., Oake Law Office, Allen, TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. SEAN MAROTTA, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by JESSICA LYNN ELLSWORTH; MARC LORELLI, FRANK A. ANGILERI, LINDA METTES, Brooks Kushman PC, Southfield, MI.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 13, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

New World International, Inc. v. Ford Global Technologies, LLC, No. 17-1956 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 13, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-01956-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-01956-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.