Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Polyzen, Inc. v. Radiadyne, LLC, No. 17-1934 (Fed. Cir. June 7, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1934
Also Docketed
No. 17-2022, No. 17-2138 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
June 7, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit POLYZEN, INC., A NORTH CAROLINA COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

RADIADYNE, LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY

CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

2017-1934, 2017-2022, 2017-2138

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina in Nos. 5:11-cv-00662-D, 5:14-cv-00323-D, Chief Judge James C. Dever, III.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH J. ZITO, DNL ZITO, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by LUIZ FELIPE OLIVEIRA.

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, Yetter Coleman LLP, Houston, TX, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by COLLIN COX, THOMAS M. MORROW.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 7, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Polyzen, Inc. v. Radiadyne, LLC, No. 17-1934 (Fed. Cir. June 7, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-01934-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-01934-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error