Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

ChriMar Holding Company, LLC v. ALE USA Inc., No. 17-1848 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2018)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1848
Decided
May 8, 2018
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

June 1, 2018 ERRATUM

Appeal Nos. 2017-1848, 2017-1911 CHRIMAR HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC., DBA CMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants

v.

ALE USA INC., FKA ALCATEL-LUCENT

ENTERPRISE USA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant Decided: May 8, 2018

Nonprecedential Opinion

Please make the following change to footnote 1: “In 2004, the IEEE changed its policy regarding the submission of letters of assurance. See J.A. 6512-13, 6716-17, 6725-26.”

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

ChriMar Holding Company, LLC v. ALE USA Inc., No. 17-1848 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-01848-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-01848-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.