Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Capital Security Systems, Inc. v. NCR Corporation, No. 17-1396 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1396
Decided
March 7, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit CAPITAL SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

NCR CORPORATION, SUNTRUST BANKS, INC.,

SUNTRUST BANK,

Defendants-Appellees

2017-1396

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in No. 1:14-cv-01516-WSD, Judge William S. Duffey, Jr.

JUDGMENT

PETER LAMBRIANAKOS, Brown Rudnick, LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ALFRED ROSS FABRICANT. PAUL WHITFIELD HUGHES, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by STEPHEN ERIC BASKIN, JONATHAN WEINBERG.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE, and STOLL,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 7, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Capital Security Systems, Inc. v. NCR Corporation, No. 17-1396 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-01396-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-01396-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error