Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Kahr v. Cole, No. 17-1391 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1391
Decided
November 9, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MICHAEL M. KAHR,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MICHAEL E. COLE, IRON WORKS

CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

2017-1391

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in No. 1:13-cv-01005-WCG, Chief Judge William C. Griesbach.

JUDGMENT

SHERRY DAWN COLEY, Davis & Kuelthau, SC, Green Bay, WI, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JAMES EARL LOWE, JR., MATTHEW R. MCCLEAN, Milwaukee, WI. PAUL J. ROBBENNOLT, Winthrop & Weinstine, PA, Minneapolis, MN, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by BRETT KLEIN.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 9, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Kahr v. Cole, No. 17-1391 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-01391-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-01391-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.