Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Source Search Technologies v. Kayak Software Corporation, No. 17-1384 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 7, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1384
Decided
September 7, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit SOURCE SEARCH TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

KAYAK SOFTWARE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

2017-1384

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in No. 1:11-cv-03388-NLH-KMW, Judge Noel Lawrence Hillman.

JUDGMENT

JEFFREY I. KAPLAN, Kaplan, Breyer, Schwarz, LLP, Matawan, NJ, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DANIEL BASOV, New York, NY. JOHN J. COTTER, K&L Gates LLP, Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 7, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Source Search Technologies v. Kayak Software Corporation, No. 17-1384 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 7, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-01384-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-01384-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.