Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

SAP america, Inc. v. Wellogix, Inc., No. 17-1176 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 12, 2018)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1176
Decided
January 12, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SAP AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

WELLOGIX, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee WELLOGIX TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC,

Defendant/Counterclaimant

ACCENTURE LLP,

Counterclaim Defendant

2017-1176

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Nos. 4:10-cv-01224, 4:11-cv-02840, Judge Simeon Timothy Lake, III.

JUDGMENT

THARAN GREGORY LANIER, Jones Day, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH BEAUCHAMP, HOW-YING ALBERT LIOU, Houston,

2TX; ISRAEL SASHA MAYERGOYZ, Chicago, IL; MEGAN S. WOODWORTH, Venable LLP, Washington, DC. RAFFI MELKONIAN, Wright Close & Barger, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellee. Also represented by RUSSELL HOLLENBECK. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 12, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

SAP america, Inc. v. Wellogix, Inc., No. 17-1176 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 12, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-01176-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-01176-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error