Fed. Cir.

Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands Corporation, No. 17-1175 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2018)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 17-1175
Also Docketed: No. 17-1760, No. 17-1811 (consolidated; same document)
Decided: January 16, 2018
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TINNUS ENTERPRISES, LLC, ZURU LTD.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

TELEBRANDS CORPORATION, BED BATH &

BEYOND, INC., FRY'S ELECTRONICS, INC.,

KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., THE

KROGER COMPANY, SEARS HOLDING

CORPORATION, TOYS 'R' US-DELAWARE, INC.,

WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants

2017-1175, 2017-1760, 2017-1811

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 6:16-cv-00033-RWS-JDL, 6:16-cv-00034-RWS-JDL, Judge Robert Schroeder, III.

JUDGMENT

THOMAS MANSFIELD DUNLAP, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Leesburg, VA, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by DAVID LUDWIG, ERIC LORENZ OLAVSON, ROBERT D. SPENDLOVE; JEFFREY AHDOOT, Wash-

2ington, DC; BRIAN M. KOIDE, Vienna, VA; CORTLAND CHRISTOPHER PUTBRESE, Richmond, VA. DAVID MICHAEL UNDERHILL, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by STACEY K. GRIGSBY, ERIC J. MAURER; ELANA ARAJ, ROBERT THOMAS MALDONADO, Cooper & Dunham, LLP, New York, NY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 16, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands Corporation, No. 17-1175 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2018).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-17-01175-0
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-01175-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error