Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

The Hilsinger Company v. Eyeego, LLC, No. 17-1128 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1128
Decided
August 15, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

THE HILSINGER COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EYEEGO, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant

OPTISOURCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant 2017-1128

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 1:13-cv-10594-IT, Judge Indira Talwani.

JUDGMENT

CRAIG M. SCOTT, Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP, Providence, RI, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by CHRISTINE K. BUSH.

THOMAS P. MCNULTY, Lando & Anastasi, LLP, Cambridge, MA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also repre-

2sented by ERIC P. CARNEVALE; LORI J. SANDMAN, Sandman & Lankford, Daytona Beach, FL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and STOLL,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 15, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

The Hilsinger Company v. Eyeego, LLC, No. 17-1128 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-01128-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-01128-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error