Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Technology Properties Limited v. Canon Inc., No. 17-1063 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1063
Also Docketed
No. 17-1536 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
April 11, 2018
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC, MCM

PORTFOLIO LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

CANON INC., CANON U.S.A., INC.,

Defendants-Appellees 2017-1063, 2017-1536

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:14-cv-03640-CW, Judge Claudia Wilken.

JUDGMENT

ANTHONY G. SIMON, The Simon Law Firm, P.C., St. Louis, MO, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Plaintiff-appellant Technology Properties Limited LLC also represented by BENJAMIN R. ASKEW, ANTHONY R. FRIEDMAN. EDWARD PETER HELLER, III, Alliacense Limited LLC, Los Altos, CA, for plaintiff-appellant MCM Portfolio LLC.

2DAVID MICHAEL MAIORANA, Jones Day, Cleveland, OH, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by CALVIN GRIFFITH; GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Washington, DC; MATTHEW J. HERTKO, Chicago, IL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 11, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Technology Properties Limited v. Canon Inc., No. 17-1063 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-01063-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-01063-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.