Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Shire Development, LLC v. Cadila Healthcare Limited, No. 17-1048 (Fed. Cir. May 9, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1048
Decided
May 9, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SHIRE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, SHIRE

PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT, INC.,

COSMO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, NOGRA

PHARMA LIMITED,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED, DBA ZYDUS

CADILA, ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2017-1048

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:10-cv-00581-KAJ, Circuit Judge Kent A. Jordan.

JUDGMENT

EDGAR HAUG, Haug Partners LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by ANDREW S. WASSON, JASON AARON LIEF, ANGUS CHEN, ELIZABETH MURPHY.

2MICHAEL JOHN GAERTNER, Locke Lord LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by ANDY JOE MILLER, JAMES THOMAS PETERKA, WASIM K. BLEIBEL, HUGH S. BALSAM, TIMOTHY FLYNN PETERSON, DAVID BRIAN ABRAMOWITZ; ANDREA LYNN WAYDA, New York, NY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 9, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Shire Development, LLC v. Cadila Healthcare Limited, No. 17-1048 (Fed. Cir. May 9, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-01048-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-01048-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.