Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Nice Systems Ltd. v. ClickFox Inc., No. 17-1041 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-1041
Decided
October 11, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit NICE SYSTEMS LTD., NICE SYSTEMS INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

CLICKFOX INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2017-1041

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:15-cv-00743-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JUDGMENT

GREGORY H. LANTIER, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by CLAIRE HYUNGYO CHUNG; S. CALVIN WALDEN, New York, NY; DAVID A. LOEWENSTEIN, CLYDE SHUMAN, GUY YONAY, Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer LLP, New York, NY. DOUGLAS SALYERS, Troutman Sanders LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by

2PUJA PATEL LEA, DUSTIN B. WEEKS; ANUP M. SHAH, Charlotte, NC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 11, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Nice Systems Ltd. v. ClickFox Inc., No. 17-1041 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-17-01041-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-17-01041-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error