Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Certusview Technologies, LLC v. S & N Locating Services, LLC, No. 16-2605 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2605
Decided
August 11, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit CERTUSVIEW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

S & N LOCATING SERVICES, LLC, S & N

COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2016-2605

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 2:13-cv-00346-MSDRJK, Judge Mark S. Davis.

JUDGMENT

THOMAS JOSEPH FRIEL, JR., Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER C. CAMPBELL, Reston, VA; ANGELA CAMPBELL TARASI, JANNA FISCHER, JAMES P. BROGAN, ORION ARMON, Broomfield, CO. DANIEL O’CONNOR, Baker & McKenzie LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by MICHAEL A. DUFFY; ERIN M. CHOI, Dallas, TX.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 11, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Certusview Technologies, LLC v. S & N Locating Services, LLC, No. 16-2605 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-02605-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02605-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error